Center for
Corporate
Governance
.
 
ISSUE #64
April 2025
 
 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INSIGHTS.
 
 
PRoFESSOR Jordi canals
Shareholders and Corporate Governance
 
 
The growing interest in how to design and implement an effective corporate governance model is mostly centered on the structure, composition and practices of the board of directors. It is a well-established fact that the board is the fulcrum of an effective corporate governance model, but shareholders also play a very relevant role in defining and supporting it.
The recent 2025 IESE - ECGI Corporate Governance Conference addressed a range of topics regarding the role and impact of shareholders on governance and strategic decision making, including decarbonization, divestments, technology and IT adoption, among others. Most companies today are facing major disruptions in products, markets and business models and will need to adopt strategic decisions and allocate additional resources to speed up their transformation. In this context, a critical question is how effective different types of shareholders are in supporting companies in their necessary evolution, not just by providing financial resources through equity, but also contributing in other ways.
Several significant reflections emerged during the conference sessions and discussions. The first is that shareholders’ time horizons should be compatible with the company’s time horizons, particularly, with investment plans. By definition, each shareholder and each company -even within the same industry- has different time horizons. Responsible investors should make sure that their plans and horizons are compatible with what the company needs to achieve. The potential misalignment in this dimension will distort expectations and can have terrible effects on companies and investors alike.
The second reflection concerns the critical role of shareholders in providing companies with effective corporate governance models and making sure that they work, especially the board of directors. Family businesses and private equity firms that control a relevant percentage of a firm’s shares are usually more committed to supporting good corporate governance, and often take an active role in it. The risk that this creates is that they may govern the company for their own benefit, not for the benefit of the company as an institution or of the other minority shareholders. 
On the other hand, institutional shareholders, with less concentrated ownership, play a critical role by providing access to organized capital markets for millions of savers around the world in a simple way. Nevertheless, the fact that most institutional investors do not invest significant time and resources engaging  with a firm’s governance is a serious flaw of this ownership model. They simply rely on other shareholders or proxy advisors. This pathway may work for them, but it does not provide a good service for the company and society at large. Firms need committed shareholders that truly care about the firm’s good governance. 
The third  reflection centers on the role of shareholders in providing a unique view of the firm and its project to all stakeholders. Corporate purpose can play a role in this process and help firms restore their reputation. In family businesses, corporate purpose grows out of the dreams and ideas of the founder. In more mature companies, purpose may emerge out of ideas that CEOs have about how to make their firm unique. 
A good purpose also highlights how the firm plans to serve customers differently, as well as the social needs related to the products and services that it offers and cares about. In this respect, purpose is different and goes beyond environmental and social regulation. A functional purpose should connect with the firm’s strategy, business model and policies. To do so effectively, the firm’s shareholders must support its purpose. A key function of ownership is to understand not only the business model, but also the type of company being invested in and its purpose.
The fourth reflection is that responsible shareholders have many tools and levers to make sure that the board is performing well and taking care of the future of the firm. The board’s proposals to shareholders, particularly those regarding board composition and board member nomination, CEO and senior executive compensation are critical. Ordinary shareholders, especially institutional shareholders, should not wait for the arrival of an activist hedge fund to engage with the board, often in an aggressive way. Ordinary shareholders should make sure that the board fulfills its governance functions professionally.
A competitive company needs a competent governance model supported by shareholders. The latter should use their power to make companies more competitive and innovative, so that they can become engines of economic prosperity and social flourishing.



 
 
NEWS&TRENDS.
 
 
 
The Russell Reynolds Associates 2025 board culture and director behavior survey found that even if boards prioritize strategic planning, risk management, CEO succession and corporate culture, they often fall short of achieving meaningful results. This article explores actionable strategies to enhance board effectiveness in these critical areas. Read more here. 
Shareholder activism saw a global rise in 2024. A recent article by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz analyzes key trends from the 2024 season and highlights anticipated developments for 2025, including an increased focus on M&A transactions and spinoffs. Read more here. 
Spencer Stuart has examined governance practices among leading public corporations in different countries in 2024, focusing on topics like board composition and compensation. Key findings are discussed in this article. 
Recently, Delaware lawmakers approved the highly controversial Senate Bill 21, which restricts shareholders from challenging certain operations if approved by a board committee that has a majority of independent directors. Further reflections on this new regulation can be found here.
David F. Larcker and coauthors reflect on how artificial intelligence could transform board functioning processes and practices. Read more here.
 
IESE's recent research.
 
 
 
Friedman, H. and Ormazabal, G. (2024). “The role of information in building a more sustainable economy: A supply and demand perspective”Journal of Accounting Research
Simeth, M., and Werheim, D. (2024): “On innovation and institutional ownership”Journal of Corporate Finance
Antón, M., Ederer, F., Giné, M., and Schmalz, M. (2024): "Innovation: The bright side of common ownership”Management Science
Vives, X. et alia (2024): "Banking turmoil and regulatory reform". London: CEPR
 
Customize Your Experience
We care about sending you only the information that matters to you. Click the button below to access your preferences page and tailor the content you want to receive from us.